Evergreen is an engineering constraint. It means, that the solution must be true and unchanging in any case, as this will affect the things that otherwise change and have to be kept out of the piece.
The elements that we have to change frequently we will put separately: price, version numbers, examples from this year, any dates. These will be easier to change in five minutes, instead of having to go through every single paragraph and edit them.
The economics only work if the piece survives. Evergreen articles recoup their cost after three to four years of traffic, so style issues like this year or examples that don’t hold up well are not really style issues. It is the difference between an asset that you profit from when you sell it, and something you pay to write and have to rewrite again in one to two years.
Generated text contains many quiet timestamps. It captures recent technology, statistics, and phrases in recent years that are fixed at a training cutoff that nobody tells you about. The article is fine to read on the day of publication, but reads outdated within a year.
The writer distinguishes what is stable from what is not when writing. Material that will retain its structure is what gets written first, while parts that will change get their own sections and a requirement for review predetermined in delivery notes. Alongside what the writer has written is a maintenance plan.
These are pages that it still makes sense to internal-link to, because permanent pages will most likely still exist. A majority of content programs have a lot of reactive or time-sensitive posts at the top, and those posts quickly stop generating value. The base of a content program should be evergreen posts, and those posts are what the other posts direct the user to.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical evergreen article | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard evergreen article | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| In-depth evergreen article | 2,000 | $200 | $2 | $202 |
| Cornerstone piece | 3,000 | $300 | $3 | $303 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Every draft goes through an editor, then through several AI detectors and a plagiarism check. Anything that does not come back clean is revised or reassigned. You get the reports with the delivery email.
What the piece is for, who reads it, roughly how long it should be, and anything it must include or avoid. Links to your existing material help. If you are unsure, send what you have and the writer will come back with questions.
Most subjects have yearly updates, with reference to the delivery note. The order for an update from us is cost-effective in the long run, as we charge for the changes done in the article, usually a very small part of the original.
Yes. The writer removes the dated framing, restores the structure to have the perishable facts co-located, and rewrites whatever doesn’t hold. It is quoted on the words we touch. You will always know from us when a rewrite is more economical than a repair.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
I needed a write-up and got a list of questions, which I ended up copying completely. Question 9 opened a topic that the person had never publicly discussed. The edits of the transcript kept her cadence.
The writer emailed before starting to ask which returns numbers we were allowed to publish. This is the first time anyone has asked this of us. The email came back as the argument with the caveat inserted, and Legal cleared it with no comment.
We’ve been outsourcing blog posts for two years and need to rewrite every intro, but this one didn’t need anything. This one went directly to our editor. The writer noticed something the rest of us and probably the past writers missed, and that is a reference to “members” in an older post, which I attached to this brief. We swear by “members” and never say “customers.”
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees