A service is a process, and that means you cannot provide a review of it by the description on a pricing page. What truly matters is how long the onboarding process was, if support responded on a Friday, what the contract says about leaving the service, and how the bill that you received for that month behaved during the third month of you having the service.
That is a diary, not a description. Our reviewers run the account and write down what happened, with dates and ticket numbers attached to every complaint.
There’s an advantage in this style of review that others do not have. Phrasing a company in a bad light for refunds means the writer has to support, name, and state something factual about the business. The writer who kept the ticket references can make that statement. Generated text can easily make up and complain about companies it has never even interacted with.
Reviews provided by generated services present a great amount of detail surrounding each element of a review. For example, wait times that never existed, pricing tiers that never were, and policies firms never offered. You regard these reviews under your publication and before any reader sees it, the vendor’s lawyer sees it.
The reviewer signs up and logs contacts with a date and reference number for each. They test cancellation too. This is the part providers make hardest and the most reviews skip. A cancellation test involves seeing how difficult cancellation is, and if potential customers are not able to see cancellation as an easy option, they will probably not sign up.
Evidence has to come first before a review is valid. Any claim that is not backed up gets cut, no matter how much it factually speaks to the truth. Providers are given the right to review and fact-check anything that we publish and we will adjust the article and include a statement to our readers saying we fact checked that statement.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical service review | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short review | 700 | $70 | $0.70 | $70.70 |
| Standard review | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| In-depth review | 1,800 | $180 | $1.80 | $181.80 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
What the piece is for, who reads it, roughly how long it should be, and anything it must include or avoid. Links to your existing material help. If you are unsure, send what you have and the writer will come back with questions.
Up to 3 days. The writer has to read around the subject before writing it, so we quote honestly rather than promising an hour. If your deadline is tighter, say so in the brief and we will tell you before you pay whether we can meet it.
This piece says that the only real assessment on their product comes from published pricing, customer interviews, and terms. Now, a free trial, a client account or a demo with real login details, creates a much better review.
Yes, but with closer control of checking. We need to ensure that everything critical is evidenced and we need to phrase it as our opinion when it is our opinion, and we also need to remove any items we are unable to defend. We also recommend that your legal team reviews this as you are the publisher and not us.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
This how-to is for a setup that changed in the last release. The author must have done it because step 6 references a dialog that comes up only if you skip the optional plugin. You can’t fake that detail.
Before our first writer began, they emailed to ask which of our two returns policies freight customers falls under. I’ve never been asked that before. The returned post had that distinction made in the second section, and I didn’t have to correct a single fact.
Most writers have their own way of talking. Each of the twelve writers here has their distinct voice. This is one of the first things I noticed about your publication. I’d guess this creates a lot of overlap among the writers and likely involves some good editing. Your style guide is fourteen pages. I’m sure they read it all.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees