Series of reports are used to analyze cumulative changes. Therefore, if there is a discrepancy in the way gross margin is computed in the second and third quarters, it would impact all the reports in a negative way. A series of reports provides an investor with the only opportunity to evaluate changes. Even if the comments are well drafted, computation changes would still make a comparative analysis difficult.
Mostly, writing is about consistency. It has to include the same definitions, cite the same sources, and words have to be in the same order. Any changes should be flagged in the text, as opposed to being hidden in the back.
Almost perfect reports are still careless reports. A misspelled word, a number off by one, a discordant percent, a metric redefined just before publication. A writer using your source files and last period’s report will catch those mistakes and will write to you about the missing figure.
Your reports don’t help. They change numbers and even worse, definition. If we are talking about ‘recurring revenue’, that means one thing at the end of the second quarter that will be stated with confidence and will likely mean something else at the end of the third quarter. Investors will notice the discrepancy and be forced to draw their own conclusion about your business. And they will not reflect our interpretation.
Your brief includes the reporting pack, period, and audience. The writer works from exports rather than from the summary I have written and aligns the key figures. The writer also produces a query list prior to reporting. Publishing will never rely on a figure the writer cannot account for the source of.
Adjust the length based on what your investors do with the report. For instance, a quarterly pack read with a call requires less narrative compared to an annual report read on its own. As the price is by the word, there is no stepping stone to grow; order 2,500 words this quarter and 1,000 words the next, for instance, if that is what the period requires.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical investor report | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary report | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Standard report | 3,000 | $300 | $3 | $303 |
| In-depth report | 6,000 | $600 | $6 | $606 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
We match the brief to a writer who has already worked in that subject area. If you have worked with an Articled writer before and want them again, name them and we will check their availability first.
Up to 3 days. The writer has to read around the subject before writing it, so we quote honestly rather than promising an hour. If your deadline is tighter, say so in the brief and we will tell you before you pay whether we can meet it.
We check whether your files are consistent. If something does not match, we will notify you. This is a basic document check and is not an audit. If a figure cannot be found in the source you provided, it will be flagged as a query instead of appearing in the report.
We would prefer that. Have the last two send it to the writer. He will keep the order of sections, place table headings and note wording. Investors read a series and an unexplained change in layout presents a question that you never intended to answer.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Our old procedures were written by people who understood the process. These are not. They name each button on each step. Two of our newer drivers used them without even asking me questions, which has never happened before.
Rewritten policy that is ninety pages long and uses plain English. Nothing important was lost in the process of softening legal language. Our employment solicitor changed only four words. This brings me satisfaction because it seems that the staff actually read the policy unlike before. I had lost hope on that.
The first brief we received was too general. The writer noted this rather than trying to understand it himself. We did a twenty-minute call. Obviously frustrating that it was needed, still useful that this happened, as the finalized procedures reflect the way the warehouse operates. This includes the different procedures the night shift performs.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees