An appraiser of your proposal will quickly read it twice, once in your meeting and again when they look for a reason to say no, outside of the meeting. You should cater your writing more toward the second reader.
That reader tends to skip the part where you restate their problem. They go straight to scope, price and the impact of time slippage, hence the need for them to have more detail than the typical proposal introduction.
By the time you’re asked to submit a proposal for a project, it’s generally too late to decide if you want that project. What is left to decide is if you are the safer option, and if the number is justified to the decision maker. A proposal that answers the first question but avoids the second will sit in the finance queue for three weeks.
Where AI falls down on proposals
Generated proposals spend two pages restating the client’s problem at them before they get vague where precision should be used. Scope boundaries, assumptions, and what happens when a dependency slips come out as soft language. That means that when a proposal is signed, it starts an argument in month three.
How We Build the Argument in No-AI Proposals
Argument: This is what you told us, this is what we’d do, this is why we’re taking this approach rather than the easier more cost effective approach, this is the total cost, and what factors of the cost are outside of our control. We write the exclusions as carefully as the inclusions, because procurement reads that section first.
Using No-AI Proposals to Support the Sale
Your champion defends your proposal when you’re not around. That’s why we provide a summary they can copy, a framework for rebutting a low bid claim, and some specific dates that help with planning. Being vague is safe but prices deals.
What proposals cost
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
Typical proposal
Words
Writing
Fee (1%)
You pay
Concise
1,500
$150
$1.50
$151.50
Standard
3,500
$350
$3.50
$353.50
Full submission
7,000
$700
$7
$707
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting.
Full pricing breakdown.
Common Questions About No-AI Proposals
Yes — 2 rounds are included, for 14 days after delivery, handled by the writer who wrote the piece rather than by someone new to the brief.
Fill in the order form with your brief and email address. No account needed. You get a confirmation by email, then the finished piece as a document within 3 days.
Both sections, and the scope, take longer. Regularly, participants share their documents with us to have us draft the required sections citing where the responsibility ends without our having to call and explain. We would appreciate it if you could share with us your deliverables, dependencies, and items you are intentionally omitting before these drafting deadlines.
Yes. We write the fixed sections correctly once and provide fields that change with each client, meaning that the subsequent proposal takes only an hour instead of a day. Make a request for it because the structure of a template is different from that of something unique.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews
What clients say about our proposals
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
FMFiona McGBid Manager, Torrent Utilities
A bit stiff, but compliant
Bid teams require mandatory answers, word counts, and criteria outlined in the headings. That is what we were missing. Refran, we have that so much covered in our house style that my tone drained out and I had to liven it before submission. It cost an evening, but at least we didn’t miss a requirement like those teams.
Verified orderProposalsJune 2026
JEJonas ESales Director, Verdant Yield
Won a tender we usually lose
Public-sector tender, forty pages, scored on the method statement. The writer read the scoring matrix and tailored the answer in that order rather than telling our story. We scored highest on quality for the first time. I don’t know if it’s repeatable but I’ll definitely be applying again for the next tender.
Verified orderProposalsJune 2026
EFEwan FBid Manager, Craigmore Civil
Matched the tender’s scoring criteria
The proposal was written with the scoring matrix in the tender document in mind, not a general pitch. Each section corresponds with a criterion. Whoever did this has actually studied a public sector tender before, which is rare.