Fellowship committees review two primary components of an application: (1) do you have the skills to accomplish this project, and (2) can you really finish this project in the time and with the available resources? Most applications fail the first and go on way too long with the second.
Both sections should appear correctly, from your own material, with the method as important as the story about why you care for the question.
Since committee members are in related but different fields, your statement has to be both true and clear to a historian sitting next to a chemist (i.e. non-technical yet clear). It involves reading what you’ve written and deciding what stays, what has to be translated, and the one strongest point that you hang your application on.
Generated statements begin with an intriguing life fascination and end with a bunch of potentially vague buzzwords. Things become methods, concepts become approaches, and timelines become phases. The panel cannot tell if the project is even possible. Institutions evaluate applications now based on initial statements. An interestingly crafted statement can make or break an application before it is even viewed.
The author reads the call, the assessment weightings, and your draft, and then walks you through the project until your argument is distilled to a single sentence. From there, everything else in the application falls in place, including the timeline and choice of host.
Send the call document and deadline in advance. Many people with fellowships work with long lead times. Some order weeks in advance so that they can reserve two revisions until their supervisors read the draft. There is no account to make and no minimum order of 100 words, you pay $10 and a 1% service fee per 100 words you order.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical fellowship application | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personal statement | 800 | $80 | $0.80 | $80.80 |
| Statement and research proposal | 2,000 | $200 | $2 | $202 |
| Full fellowship package | 3,500 | $350 | $3.50 | $353.50 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Yes. Send two or three pieces you like the sound of, or your style guide. Matching an established voice is ordinary work for a writer and close to impossible for a model that has never read your back catalogue.
Yes. Tell us the volume and cadence and we keep the same writer on the account so the voice stays consistent. The rate does not change with volume.
The writer does not provide the science; that is your job. Their focus is structure, argumentation, and the right language for the situation. This process is usually more effective if you show us your drafts, earlier versions of the paper, or talk for an hour. After that, we edit any part of the text where we addressed something technical that we had no way to fact-check. You provide the confirmations.
Whether editing assistance is permitted is an institution-specific rules call, so check there first. As long as you come up with the ideas and evidence yourself, professional editing assistance with writing is often allowed. We provide detector reports along with every submission, which is the part institutions ask about most.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
I applied to 11 jobs with my own application and received 0 feedback. I ordered 3 custom applications, and the third received a callback. The job ad mentioned a comfort level with ambiguity, and the writer focused the paragraph on a project of mine that was all about ambiguity.
Our applications typically answer a question that is broader than the one that is being asked. That was not the case on this application. All sections stayed within the word count and within the question. I am not claiming direct credit for this, but we got the grant. This was the best application we have submitted to date.
I have compressed twenty years of shift work in to this submission. The writer wanted to know what I’d been promoted for, not what my job title was, so my CV is more of a progressive account than a list.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees