Human-Only Analytical Reports for Brands and Teams
Description is easy, analysis is hard. Anyone can pull the fact from a system that revenue fell eleven percent in the south. Of the four explanations that would each produce this fact and the work that goes with it is usually a back to the drawing board for more data.
An analytical report from us includes the explanations that were considered and rejected. A conclusion is far more convincing when you can see what it beat.
An analysis is credible when it identifies the alternatives and deals with them. If a change occurred when the price increased along a seasonal peak and a competitor outage, stating that the change is one of the three without addressing the other two is not analysis. It is a preference stated in the past tense.
Where AI falls down on analytical reports
Your generated analysis shows your writing style, and your style is to jump straight to the conclusion. Analytical writing is easy to mimic because the shape of an argument is simply the finding, three supporting sentences, and a recommendation. The analysis comes across as thought out and complete, but it is clear no competing explanation was ever considered.
Sources, Analysis and Writing for No-AI Analytical Reports
The writer starts with the question rather than the dataset, because a dataset will answer any question badly if you ask it the wrong way. Then description, then candidate explanations, then whatever additional cut of the data would actually separate them.
What Your No-AI Analytical Reports Will Include
A clear description of the finding, the reasoning behind it, the alternatives it eliminated, and the implications for your decision come with the finding. The report explains the measurement that would resolve the ambiguity when the data can not distinguish between two explanations. This saves time and money for the next analysis.
What analytical reports cost
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
Typical analytical report
Words
Writing
Fee (1%)
You pay
Summary report
1,200
$120
$1.20
$121.20
Standard report
3,000
$300
$3
$303
In-depth report
6,000
$600
$6
$606
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting.
Full pricing breakdown.
No-AI Analytical Reports FAQs
Primary sources wherever they exist — your own data, published research, filings, regulator and industry figures — with secondary reporting used only where nothing better is available. Everything used is listed with links so you can check it.
We write the analysis, label what each figure shows and describe the charts your designer should build, including the takeaway each one has to land. We do not produce finished graphics, so tell us if you need the underlying numbers laid out for a designer.
The writer analyzes data sets to test explanations and does the math that description calls for. Any other modeling or inferences that require causality and expertise stays with your analysts, and the report is drafted based on their findings.
We’ll tell you about it in the draft than in the meeting. The report explains what caused the shift in the view and gives us an idea of how much confidence there is in the new reading. This is normally a fairly easy conversation as long as it happens in a timely manner.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews
What clients say about our analytical reports
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
SVSanne VHead of Content, Duinhof Energy
The caveats strengthened the argument
We anticipated the typical one-sided whitepaper on heat pump retrofits, but this one actually named the two building types for which the economics do not work. Sales Initially pushed back against this whitepaper, but it is now the asset type that converts best because engineers trust it.
Verified orderWhitepapersMay 2025
CSCamila SPrograms Director, Lumbre Foundation
Good report, chart labels messed up
The narrative was strong, and the board approved of it without any changes or comments. Two chart captions had the wrong year, and while I can say I caught it, I shouldn’t have to. They fixed it within an hour of me pointing it out. The rest of the report was in good order.
Verified orderImpact reportsDecember 2025
LJLotte JInsights Lead, Sablefield Research
Did not oversell a small sample
The sample size was 214 responses. More importantly, that information appears in the second paragraph of the report instead of being placed in an appendix. Percentages always retain the base number. There are agency reports that mean to mislead and do neither.