An annual report gets reviewed by individuals checking it against the accounts. If the letter by the Chief Executive is constructive, and note fourteen shows an impairment, someone will take notice and the entire report will lose credibility because of one paragraph.
We prepare the narration sections of the report which includes the review of the year, operating commentary, and people and governance sections. Your accountants and auditors take care of the numbers, and we prepare the facts around them and make our story accurate.
A year is not a list of announcements. A good year summary reflects on the board minutes, internal memos, and customer numbers. It captures the “shape” of the year. A shareholder will remember the slow year start, the unexpected turn in June, the cost that showed up in December. A year summary conveys the actual experience of the year.
A generic copy of an annual report tends to be complimentary. Not knowing your accounts forces the report to praise whatever year it knows nothing about with generic complimentary sentences. Place it next to hard accounting years with audited numbers and readers lose faith in the rest of the report.
The author uses a given number and a given set of circumstances to find an answer. The author wants to find out what happened, when it happened, and why it happened, among other things. Each contribution made by each department is presented by six voices, and the main challenge is to integrate them, balancing them, so they maintain the identity of a single, unified organization.
Presentation here is a legal and reputational matter, so the tone stays measured. Achievements are stated with the figure attached rather than with adjectives. Setbacks get a sentence on cause and a sentence on response. Anything counsel or your accountants should approve is flagged in the margin instead of being smoothed into the prose.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical annual report | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary report | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Standard report | 3,000 | $300 | $3 | $303 |
| In-depth report | 6,000 | $600 | $6 | $606 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
As detailed as the brief and the word count allow. Because you pay by the word rather than by tier, depth is a decision you make rather than a package you upgrade to. Tell the writer what the reader already knows and they will pitch it there.
Yes. Send the template, a previous example, or the structure you are required to use, and the writer works inside it. If a required section does not fit the material honestly, they will flag it rather than pad it out.
No. Those are your accountant’s and auditor’s comments. Those are beyond our scope and thus we would not touch them. We would write the narrative around those comments, and every number referenced would be reconciled to the signed copy. This way the two disjointed sections of the document do not become a contradiction.
When management accounts are being finalized, which happens about four to six weeks before the design of the report, begin the process. To avoid having to do everything in a crunch due to the need for audit sign-off, this is the best way to go about the process. It is always the last-minute writing that suffers.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
The chair’s introduction and year-in-review section surpass all our internal drafts. Where it missed the mark: the writer did not draft when the finance numbers were pending. That resulted in a tight deadline for the final week. Other writers suggest using placeholder text to fill gaps.
Getting housing data wrong can be frustrating. Our writer noticed two instances where the spreadsheet data contradicted the board pack data. Instead of trying to choose a side, he asked which one was right. That kind of caution is better than good writing.
Each claim in the front section connects to a statement in the back section. Normally, our auditor finds and notes between four and five unclear sentences in the chairman’s letter. This year, there were none.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees