Did the math and caught our error
We submitted our paper and a spreadsheet. Our writer said our sample size was too small. We modified the claim. It’s a slightly bruised ego, but better paper and nobody has criticized it in public yet.
Half of SEO reporting means explaining movement that was caused by others. Position swings during core updates, a rival’s page obtains a link, and a report that credits every upward movement to the retainer will eventually have to explain a downward movement by the same reasoning.
We’ll focus on three key aspects when reporting: what changed, what was done, and how people can be confident that the two are related.
A dependable SEO report times algorithm updates along with the work. When traffic moves within an update window, the report states that as opposed to giving credit to the new title tags. This costs some victories, but it earns the right to be believed when something actually worked.
Having a model produce an SEO report shows the causal narrative favorable to you: SEO work increases rankings, engagement signals become stronger, and authority is built. Because a model does not have your Search Console data, none of those sentences holds up when a client asks which specific page, and which specific time period, those changes were discovered.
The author arranges rankings, Search Console, analytics, and your work log in sequential order. Most of the work is then done by the author. Shipments occurred in week two, activity occurred in week five, an update occurred in week four, and one sincere sentence of the author’s reflecting on the work.
This report discusses shipped and moved items as well as items that are queued to be shipped. We analyzed commercially important pages and the long tail separately. We have eliminated the paragraphs explaining long-term trends and given you the next test and the diagnosis for items that dropped.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical SEO report | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary report | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Standard report | 3,000 | $300 | $3 | $303 |
| In-depth report | 6,000 | $600 | $6 | $606 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Primary sources wherever they exist — your own data, published research, filings, regulator and industry figures — with secondary reporting used only where nothing better is available. Everything used is listed with links so you can check it.
We write the analysis, label what each figure shows and describe the charts your designer should build, including the takeaway each one has to land. We do not produce finished graphics, so tell us if you need the underlying numbers laid out for a designer.
That is how it typically works. Please submit your work log and grant the writer read-only permissions to the tool or, if you prefer, exports. The writer takes your analysis and renders it in a manner that clients or executives can follow each month. The writer does not perform redundant analysis.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
We submitted our paper and a spreadsheet. Our writer said our sample size was too small. We modified the claim. It’s a slightly bruised ego, but better paper and nobody has criticized it in public yet.
The chair’s introduction and year-in-review section surpass all our internal drafts. Where it missed the mark: the writer did not draft when the finance numbers were pending. That resulted in a tight deadline for the final week. Other writers suggest using placeholder text to fill gaps.
We anticipated the typical one-sided whitepaper on heat pump retrofits, but this one actually named the two building types for which the economics do not work. Sales Initially pushed back against this whitepaper, but it is now the asset type that converts best because engineers trust it.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees