Human-Only Due-diligence Reports for Brands and Teams
The most important part of a due-diligence report is the list of things that couldn’t be confirmed. Deals get priced based on what is known and renegotiated on the basis of assumptions. Therefore, filling these gaps early gives the buyer protection.
Due diligence reports will be prepared by us from the documents already provided to us: filings, contracts, data room index, and notes prepared by your advisors. Your legal and financial confirmation will remain with your professionals.
Why No-AI Due-diligence Reports Need Real Research
Adversarial research is accurately describing the actions of the seller as the buyer would perceive them. For example, filing a notice saying a contract is renewable annually is not the equivalent of an annual renewal contract. The contract determines what type of contract you purchase.
Rushed diligence leads to documents that restate what the seller has provided to the buyer.
Where AI falls down on due-diligence reports
Generated diligence writing cannot distinguish between a claim and a verified fact, so everything is written with the same confidence. The seller’s revenue statement and the audited figure appear on the page as the same number, and the point of the exercise, which is to distinguish those two numbers, is completely moot.
How We Research and Structure No-AI Due-diligence Reports
The writer follows a checklist agreed with you and notes every item as verified, partial or pending. Nothing is considered confirmed based on a management presentation. In the case of a contradiction of a claim with a document, both versions are included in the report.
Presenting Findings in No-AI Due-diligence Reports
Results are classified by how they affect the deal rather than workstream. Any section affecting price, structure, or timing comes first, with the document reference next to it, then the remaining items on the list, then the details. Reports classified by workstream bury the one concern that affects the deal inside section six.
What due-diligence reports cost
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
Typical due-diligence report
Words
Writing
Fee (1%)
You pay
Summary report
1,200
$120
$1.20
$121.20
Standard report
3,000
$300
$3
$303
In-depth report
6,000
$600
$6
$606
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting.
Full pricing breakdown.
No-AI Due-diligence Reports FAQs
Primary sources wherever they exist — your own data, published research, filings, regulator and industry figures — with secondary reporting used only where nothing better is available. Everything used is listed with links so you can check it.
We write the analysis, label what each figure shows and describe the charts your designer should build, including the takeaway each one has to land. We do not produce finished graphics, so tell us if you need the underlying numbers laid out for a designer.
Our standard is up to three days, but final week diligence timetables are often tighter than that. Please communicate your deadline before you order, and we will confirm whether we can meet that deadline, which is better than taking your order and delivering it after we miss the deadline.
No. We report verbatim the documents from which we cite and assert when we see inconsistencies. For legal and accounting views, you will engage advisors, and we have built the report to expedite their review: every finding is checked with the document behind it.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews
What clients say about our due-diligence reports
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Getting housing data wrong can be frustrating. Our writer noticed two instances where the spreadsheet data contradicted the board pack data. Instead of trying to choose a side, he asked which one was right. That kind of caution is better than good writing.
Verified orderAnnual reportsJuly 2026
ENEmeka NFinance Director, Nkemdi Holdings
The narrative matched the accounts
Each claim in the front section connects to a statement in the back section. Normally, our auditor finds and notes between four and five unclear sentences in the chairman’s letter. This year, there were none.
Verified orderAnnual reportsOctober 2025
ATAiko TStrategy Analyst, Kiriwood Consulting
Caveats section made it credible
The final half page explains what the analysis was unable to confirm through public sources. Most vendors tend to hide that, or simply eliminate it. Our partners actually read that section first which is why the report was presented to the client without any changes.