The tourism board copy is the only travel medium that is read by potential travelers’ readers, operators, funding groups, councils, and cultural groups. Each of these groups has the opportunity to send edits back to the board.
Writing that is tailored to the anticipated reader is often reviewed with speed and favor. Writing that becomes a sprawling adjectival mass in describing regions is critiqued word by word and appreciated with increasing nuance.
Your use of member or taxpayer dollars to describe communities might cause you to consider the quality of your work to a greater degree. There are two factors to think about: accuracy of region, and equity in how groups are represented. A reporter can seek to know which communities want to be surveyed about the project, what names are currently used for places, and which enterprises were omitted last time.
Each region is described with the same vocabulary in generated destination marketing; as such, coastlines in the same way are described in every region. It also uses old source copy to describe places, meaning that contested or obsolete names are employed. This issue is the first thing that a community reviewer will catch.
We match on regional experience and type of work that has more stakeholder interactions, since these are different skills. A writer who has been through a council approval process will write differently. Source your claims, earn your superlatives, and have your sections designed so they can be switched out without unraveling the rest.
Include the approval chain with the brief you send using the order form. As each committee member can sign off on a particular page of the brief, we quote per page. Signing up is not necessary, and your finance contact will receive the invoice. The cost is $10 for 100 words with a 1% surcharge.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical tourism-board content | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short | 500 | $50 | $0.50 | $50.50 |
| Standard | 1,000 | $100 | $1 | $101 |
| In-depth | 2,000 | $200 | $2 | $202 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Yes. Send two or three pieces you like the sound of, or your style guide. Matching an established voice is ordinary work for a writer and close to impossible for a model that has never read your back catalogue.
Yes. Tell us the volume and cadence and we keep the same writer on the account so the voice stays consistent. The rate does not change with volume.
We don’t write for others. The writer uses materials published by or approved by the communities and gives attribution to the sources, prefacing the materials under review by those communities. We do not write to fill this gap when no approved materials exist.
Yes, partners receive full copyright upon delivery, requiring no attribution. Partners can re-publish content under any license terms. If draft brief panels are required, which alters the word count for each section, then that should be stated at the brief stage.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Four city guides, three of them perfect. The fourth said a museum had updated its winter hours last year. This was fixed within a day after I reported it. The others were unchecked, but they went ahead and double checked them. I do recommend this guide, but check the time sensitive items for yourself.
It was a good draft, but unfortunately, we weren’t able to take credit. We did, however, send back four photos and explained the pier to them all. The second draft also included information about the pier, room three’s low ceilings, and our no breakfast before eight policy. This one is officially on the site.
Everything we’ve made in house, every battle card, turned into three pages no one opened. This is one, with the two objections that actually show up and a decent answer for each. Adoption is the only metric we care about and it’s almost all there.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees