Travel blogging, as a genre, has a problem with its own evidence. Readers have learned to look for specific details that prove a claimed first-person trip. These details might be a price paid, a wrong turn, or inclement weather that ruined an afternoon.
These details are the only asset a post has. Without them, a post is simply a rearranging of the same search results. That is how it reads to a person and to a ranking system.
We will not write a first-person account of a non-existent trip. If the writer has been there, the post cites that and provides the straightforward details. If the writer has no experience, the voice used leads the reader to anticipate what they are getting; and, so that there are no surprises and drafting begins in full compliance, the voice used claims to lack the experience.
Generated travel writing lacks memory, so it substitutes atmosphere for evidence. It describes golden light and bustling markets, and refers to hidden gems. It does not mention the price, the queue, or the fact the bus does not run on Sundays because it was never there.
There are a lot of writers that make assignments from hiking trips, family vacations, and budget travels. They cover everything related to backpacking and sleeping on trains. A lot of already written passages within drafts are picked up by our plagiarism tools. They’re returned with reports instead of promises.
Your blog is the flooded top of your funnel. What works still, in your current situation, is depth on a single topic: a single example, a single week with a toddler in the house, or a single line on a train. Posts illustrating depth on a topic tend to get shared and linked, in turn driving traffic to the pages where you actually take bookings.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical travel blog | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short | 500 | $50 | $0.50 | $50.50 |
| Standard | 1,000 | $100 | $1 | $101 |
| In-depth | 2,000 | $200 | $2 | $202 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
What the piece is for, who reads it, roughly how long it should be, and anything it must include or avoid. Links to your existing material help. If you are unsure, send what you have and the writer will come back with questions.
Up to 3 days. The writer has to read around the subject before writing it, so we quote honestly rather than promising an hour. If your deadline is tighter, say so in the brief and we will tell you before you pay whether we can meet it.
Yours, if you choose. Copyrights are yours upon delivery, credit is not required. Some clients appreciate a writer byline because the readers perceive it as more credible, and we can include your bio if you choose to do that. Continue Assemble.eql(‘song’) Assemble. Song.new.assemble Bundle.songs(list) You can compile several songs at once by calling Bundle multiple times. You can bundle all your songs together by calling Assembly once. Bundle.songs You can repo all your notes by calling Notes once.
You should provide three self-identified on-brand posts for the writer to analyze and use as a starting guide. Matching a voice generally takes one round of revisions, and so as we promised, we are happy to provide two rounds of revisions for fourteen days after the initial delivery.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Four city guides, three of them perfect. The fourth said a museum had updated its winter hours last year. This was fixed within a day after I reported it. The others were unchecked, but they went ahead and double checked them. I do recommend this guide, but check the time sensitive items for yourself.
It was a good draft, but unfortunately, we weren’t able to take credit. We did, however, send back four photos and explained the pier to them all. The second draft also included information about the pier, room three’s low ceilings, and our no breakfast before eight policy. This one is officially on the site.
Body copy hit the nail on the first draft. The headline tried to be clever with a pun, but it only made sense to the person who made the pun, and that was the only person who could appreciate it. I flagged it and had four alternatives by the next morning. I used the second. Missed the first swing, but the quick fix version was well received.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees