Converting a document from Harvard to APA formatting is not merely a case of find and replace. As in-text markers change shape, the order of the reference list is altered, and some entries require an element that the previous style did not capture, every footnote that cites a source must be redone.
This is the job completed by hand and checked. At the end of the job, you get both halves converted consistently and a list of things that could not be converted without more input from you. Just send the document and the target style for this request.
Automated conversion tends to break quietly as it usually gets 90 percent correct and the results stop being checked after the first page. The other 10 percent of mistakes are always made in the strings of text a marker notices. This includes edited collections and translations, secondary sources, and any organization cited as the author.
An automated pass that relies solely on existing metadata will keep whatever errors were made in one format when converted to another. Errors made in Harvard that were previously wrong now look like they were verified in APA. Automated passes never go back to the original document to see who was the original editor.
Citations list every citation in text, in footnotes, and in all figure captions. Each citation is converted individually against a target style guide. The reference list is recreated and reordered. Entries without an element the new style needs are listed with a space for the new required element.
Although formatting doesn’t impact the substance or reasoning of the argument, we find pretty much every format we’ve read to include formatting. Keep the original file. If a decision is overturned by a supervisor or journal, having the pre-conversion version avoids the expense of the conversion twice. Having the original and converted versions illustrates the exact changes that were made.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical citation formatting | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short list | 250 | $25 | $0.25 | $25.25 |
| Standard | 700 | $70 | $0.70 | $70.70 |
| Extensive | 1,500 | $150 | $1.50 | $151.50 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Like everything else, count by word. Ten words per reference gives a ballpark figure of two hundred references being equivalent to four thousand words, which is four hundred dollars of writing and adds the one percent fee.
This is usually the case. The writer determines which entries follow which convention and sorts everything in the target style. The writer also flags any entry in which ambiguity in the original form forced some detail to be lost.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
An interview before this writing took an hour and had more to do with other things than my grades. The feedback that followed includes a lead with an example I would have thought too small to cite. I received an offer.
Your proposal has passed our committee on the first read this time. Our reviewer said the sampling rationale was clear in your proposal. It is good that the originality reports came with the submission email without having to request them myself since it matters more than it should in my department.
They’re not summaries. Each entry explains how the source relates to my argument and where it contradicts another source on the list. Forty entries. It reorganized my reading rather than recording it.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees