Awards are scored, not read. A judge has a rubric with weightings on it, sixty entries to get through, and a box on the form for each criterion. An entry that tells a lovely story across the wrong boxes scores badly, and nobody ever explains why.
First you’ll need the entry form. We’ll need the requirements and word limit for each question. The remainder of the entry will be fitting evidence into the boxes provided while using the exact word limit.
You may not have all the requested data. Judges score evidence, so entry which states the campaign performed well loses to an entry which states a score and provides a source. We cannot guarantee shortlisting or a win, and any writer claiming to do so is speculating. What we can control is whether the entry provides an answer to the question(s).
Each answer written to its own question and word cap.
Evidence and figures supplied by you, attributed on the page.
No claims we cannot support and you cannot defend.
Where AI falls down on award submissions
Entries that exceed the word count answer the question that they imagine was asked. They also fictionalise the evidence, and awards bodies are demanding increasingly persuasive demonstrations before including a subject on the shortlist. An entry that is disqualified due to the unsubstantiated number is more expensive than the fee.
Research and Writing for No-AI Award Submissions
The writer reads through the criteria, weightings and last year’s winner information published by the organizer to determine what evidence will go in each section. Questions are asked early and even at the risk of being an annoyance, as it is easier to adjust with an answer than to fill in the blanks. Drafting will be the last of the stages to be completed.
How an award submission gets written here
You send the entry form, the published criteria and the submission deadline.
Writer maps your evidence to each question and flags where it looks thin.
Each answer drafted to its exact word or character limit.
Figures checked against your source documents, then detector verification runs.
Final Delivery of No-AI Award Submissions
Each answer is its own labeled block, along with the question and word count, so there is no need to trim anything to enter each block. Notes that cite evidence are included, and notes without evidence are explained in covering notes. We recommend you place your order at least a week ahead of the deadline. The portals close exactly on deadline, and we cannot go back and reopen them.
One block per question, labeled and inside its word limit.
A covering note listing claims that still need evidence.
Supporting statements drafted for any required testimonials.
Two revision rounds, usable before your submission deadline.
Detector reports attached, in case the organizer asks.
What people commission award submissions for
Industry and trade association award entries.
Employer and workplace award submissions.
Grant and fellowship applications with scored criteria.
Reentering a category you were shortlisted for before.
What award submissions cost
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
Typical award submission
Words
Writing
Fee (1%)
You pay
Single category entry
800
$80
$0.80
$80.80
Entry with supporting statements
1,500
$150
$1.50
$151.50
Multi-category submission set
2,500
$250
$2.50
$252.50
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting.
Full pricing breakdown.
Buying No-AI Award Submissions: FAQs
Anything from 100 words up. Because you pay by the word you are never buying padding to fill a package tier.
Yes. Tell us the volume and cadence and we keep the same writer on the account so the voice stays consistent. The rate does not change with volume.
We do not assume. Send the entry pack because different years have different questions and different weightings and last year’s guidance is typically wrong. If the criteria are available online, tell us where and the writer will use the most current version.
We won’t pretend to know the exact nature of the judging criteria. You will not find clear answers as to what winning entries have in common. However, there are categories which have a lot of strong entries, whereas other categories receive few. A good entry stops you from losing due to a poor presentation.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews
What clients say about our award submissions
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
CLChiara LMarketing Director, Ferrant Instruments
Trade press ran it almost as is
Two out of four outlets put your article out exactly like it was in our lead paragraph. Every other lead-in has either ignored or rewritten our releases. What’s notable here is that our lead-in this time was our measurement change, while in the past it was company achievement.
Verified orderPress releasesOctober 2025
IMIdris MCommunications Director, Havenmoor Trust
A journalist ran it nearly verbatim
The release covers the number first, and puts the CEO quote in the fourth position. It was picked by two industry magazines. One modified six words. I have been a writer of releases for 15 years, and that has only happened to me on two occasions.
Our old procedures were written by people who understood the process. These are not. They name each button on each step. Two of our newer drivers used them without even asking me questions, which has never happened before.